Matt's Blog
A blog created for MDSB62
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
From User to Creator
Second Life or Second Beginning?
Monday, February 21, 2011
Snopes
For thousands of years, the truth of content has been an important issue in communication. People will create false rumors, often to create interest in an audience. As I’m sure you already know, this is still a common issue today. In fact, it’s only increased as spreading messages has become easier through advancements in technology. We see it every day in things like tabloid journals, chain mail, and more recently, blogging.
Snopes.com is a website that’s trying to tackle this issue. Snopes.com looks into common rumors and urban legends, researching to find out if they’re true or not. Due to their consistency of thorough, honest reports, Snopes.com has been profiled by several news networks such as: CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, BBC News, and many others. People are tired of the rumors, and thirsty for the truth, as shown through the hundreds of thousands of hits received every day.
On a personal response though, Snopes.com doesn’t seem to offer the service they advertise as well as resources like Google News and Wikipedia. The cite is run by a husband wife couple who create almost all of the content on the website. Unfortunately, two people just aren’t good enough to keep up with amount of rumors being spread around the internet. I love the idea of Snopes.com, but the few times I’ve used it to find out about a rumor, there’s been nothing reported on what I’m searching for. As opposed to open sourced resources that accumulate knowledge from all over the internet, like on Google News and Wikipedia. This shows through the trend of interest around Snopes.com. On Google Trend, it shows Snopes.com to be searched less and less on Google. I believe this is due to the fact that their content just can’t keep up with the content of other websites that offer similar services. Unless Snopes.com changes their format, I doubt they’ll keep up with the competitors.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Jealous of Facebook?
I remember the first time I used Facebook. Within a matter of 6 months, almost everyone I knew had portrayed the digital version of themselves on this nifty little website. I could connect with my friends on a different level; I could see everything that was none of my business. In turn, my friends were able to see everything I posted, weather I wanted everything to be seen or not. This lead me to create what I like to call the “highlight reel” of my life, where I only posted what I was willing to have everyone see. It’s not that Facebook became a false reality, it was just a selective reality displaying the “me” that I wanted people to see. It’s pretty easy to see the ethical dishonesty here, but what's harder to recognize is the effect this can have on spectators. Recent psychological research is beginning to show that using social networking sites like Facebook can actually cause jealousy or stress thanks to little “highlight reels” like mine.
People are overestimating the happiness of their friends. Alex Jordan, a Ph.D. student at Stanford lead a research paper in the January issue ofPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin which studied people’s reaction to Facebook profiles. Jordan asked the 80 freshman’s about their friends and recent events. The study showed that these students were unable to account the negative events in their peers lives. The arguments here is that people naturally want to be happier then their peers, so when we have fabricated images of our peers, it becomes increasingly unrealistic to reach this goal. In other words, seeing our friend’s have fun on facebook, makes us jelous in real life. Another study lead by psychologists at Edinburgh Napier University analyzed how Facebook causes stress. They surveyed 200 students and found that they were often stressed by turning down friend requests, deleting unwanted contacts, and the pressure to be entertaining. Looking at these studies, I question if Facebook is the social saviour I originally thought it to be.
Now, it’s a little unfair to look at a few studies that show the negative effects of Facebook and label it as evil; if that were the case, I could probably prove anything to be evil. The question is weather the negatives outweigh the positives. Unfortunately, it’s a little tough to practically answer this question, but it should be questioned weather Facebook is necessary to our lives. Were our lives really that bad before these websites took over our social lives? As for me, my account has been deactivated for almost 2 years now, and I don’t plan on reactivating it without a practical purpose.
Here are the some reference to my sources:
Misery Has More Company Than People Think
Dies Facebook Stress You Out?
Here are some other sources I found interesting:
How Facebook Breeds Jelousy
Jelous Much? MySpace, Facebook Can Spark It